Unlike James Collins, we don’t have terminal access to any servers in Australia. As I’ve detailed before, our sites are hosted in the US. James was kind and diligent enough to do some further testing comparing Microsoft’s CDN to Google’s. He found they resolved as follows:
If you have the chance, I’d love you to test where ajax.aspnetcdn.com and ajax.googleapis.com resolve to for you. You can do a traceroute and you should be able to work out the destination from host names and response times. Letting me know via twitter is probably easiest, my username is @pwcc.
Obviously, I should have done all this checking before writing the post. By failing to do so, I look a bit of a tit.
Note: After publishing this article, I was given the results of traceroutes from other Australian cities. The results showed I was wrong.
Over on Twitter @bobearth, prompted me to run some trace routes against the Google CDN and compare it to the Microsoft CDN. It appears Google have taken the distributed network out of their CDN.
As you’re probably aware, CDN is an abbreviation for content distributed network. The idea behind them is that American users will be served content from a server located in the US or Canada, Australian users will be served content from a server located in Australia or the Pacific, and so on.
Using the Google AJAX Libraries API, there are several options for specifying the version numbers of the library you wish to use, for example the following URLs all point to the latest version – at the time of writing – of jQuery.
- http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/jquery.min.js, and,
The first uses the latest release in the version 1 tree, the second the latest in the version 1.3 tree, and the third the release 1.3.0 exactly. What I found interesting – and discovered accidently – is the browser caching times for each of these urls; the first two are cached for an hour, the third for twelve months.
The vastly different caching times make perfect sense, in the first two cases, the developer is expecting an upgrade to the latest version, and doesn’t want to wait up to twelve months for it; in the third case the developer doesn’t expect an upgrade so an extended caching period has no effect.
To take full advantage of the Google servers, as described in a recent article by Dave Ward, the caching times suggest it’s best to specify the full version of the library you wish to use.
google.load Method – Update Jan 24, 2009